The Hien appears to be in the late war factory finish with solid painted upper surfaces, a finish also applied by Army depots following the decision to instigate factory painting of aircraft after June 1944. They all display the senchi hiyoshiki 'war front sign' of a white band around the fuselage forward of the tail and the wing leading edges appear to have rather deep IFF strips. The aircraft above appears to have the number '09' on the fuselage between the hinomaru and fuselage band, perhaps the 'last two' of the uncoded construction number.
I am also very grateful for the kind permission of author Simon Gifford to share another image (above) of a Hien at Hmawbi from his book 'Rapid Rundown' published by Fonthill Media in 2014. This does not appear to be the same aircraft as in Jordan's photos as the 'number' (?) between hinomaru and fuselage band is applied in a slightly different position. Simon also provided another image of a Hien taken at Changi airfield, Singapore (shown below).
Hien is not much associated with Burma and although the 50th Sentai brought at least two examples into theatre for evaluation preparatory to potential re-equipment (as recounted in my Ki-61/Ki-100 Aces published by Osprey) the unit identity of these Hien at Hmawbi is uncertain. Although the airfield at Hmawbi, north-west of Rangoon (now Yangon) is usually recorded as a singular entity it was in fact a complex of airfields comprising Hmawbi East and West, Wanetchaung where the 4th Air Brigade HQ was based, Letpodaung North and Central, plus four nearby dispersal landing grounds. Under Japanese control Hmawbi had no permanent Sentai occupation (from late 1944 until early 1945 the 8th and 50th Sentai staged into it from Indo-China) but was administered by 17 Hikojo Chutai (Airfield Company) consisting of a Chutai HQ with integral Shikihan or administration section. The Shikihan had a staff of about 30 personnel with a WO in command. Other sub-units were the Seibi Shotai responsible for the refuelling and general first line maintenance of aircraft using the airfield, including overseeing the construction and repair of runways by locally requisitioned workers. Its establishment was four NCOs and 45 enlisted personnel, commanded by a Lieutenant. The Keibi Shotai was responsible for guarding the airfield, fuel and ammunition dumps, as well as motor transport, and consisted of about 30 personnel commanded by a Lieutenant. Finally the Zairyohan was responsible for the storage and issue of tools and other equipment, staffed by two NCOs and seven enlisted personnel under the command of a Lieutenant. The independent staffing of airfields with multiple satellite dispersals, together with the rapid staging of Sentai in Burma, was one of the main reasons that the IJAAF, significantly outnumbered in the theatre and subject to constant Allied interdiction, was able to maintain a presence there almost to the end, often staging in from more permanent bases in Thailand and Indo-China for specific operations as well as staging to forward airfields from airfields in the rear.
3 comments:
Thank you for the interesting background to the Jordan's photo's and Hiens operating in Burma. Although Hien "09" looks somewhat generic, the aircraft number and the deep leading edge bands (something I didn't initially notice), could make for a somewhat unique aircraft, and a nice alternative the the ubiquitous 244 Sentai Tei.
Woody K
This was a most interesting post, for the 'new' photos as well as their commentary. Nicely presented, and thanks to those who were willing to provide them. Akimoto's series which you mention is an excellent source for its brief Sentai (and other unit) histories, besides its markings presentation.
Great work, Nick. Thanks for sharing it with us. Much appreciated.
Post a Comment